Rosenbloom v metromedia

2020-02-29 07:13

Radio station, WIP, which Metromedia owned, broadcast the following story twice: The Special Investigations Squad raided the home of George Rosenbloom in the 1800 block of Vesta Street this afternoon. Police confiscated 1, 000 allegedly obscene books at Rosenbloom's home and arrested him on charges of possession of obscene literature.Rosenbloom then sued Metromedia for libel. The district court held that the First Amendment standard, which allowed recovery of damages only for knowingly and recklessly false statements, did not apply because Rosenbloom was not a public official or figure. rosenbloom v metromedia

George Rosenbloom. Respondent. Metromedia, Inc. Petitioner's Claim. A radio station that broadcast defamatory information about a private individual has committed libel, since the news was not about a public figure or public official. Chief Lawyer for Petitioner. Ramsey Clark. Chief Lawyer for Respondent. Bernard G. Segal. Justices for the Court

In a series of cases beginning with New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U. S. 254 (1964), the Court has considered the limitations upon state libel laws imposed by the constitutional guarantees of freedom of speech and of the press. How can the answer be improved?rosenbloom v metromedia Rosenbloom then sued Metromedia for libel. The district court held that the First Amendment standard, which allowed recovery of damages only for knowingly and recklessly false statements, did not apply because Rosenbloom was not a public official or figure.

Rating: 4.44 / Views: 565